How Old Was Rachel Ward Reviews for Thornbirds
Their slap-up honey... in the last shot!
Warning: Spoilers
The concluding scene was for me the nigh touching... The ambitious priest was leaving for Rome... He was waiting to say goodbye... He was anxious to encounter Meggie... Where is she?
Every bit the train begins to move, every time with more speed, the all-time shot of the film came when we saw Meggie on her equus caballus in that lovely place, awaiting for the train to laissez passer, barely able to utter concluding infinitesimal thoughts about what she really feels...
Suddenly Ralph sees her from his window... In this precise moment 'everything' was in dull motion... Of grade, two lovers were communicating, the globe had to stop!
Meggie's eyes were more focused, intense, commanding, and Ralph seemed, momentarily out of himself to bond with her in this gorgeous identify... He knew the intensity of this moment would fade... So we read Meggie's lips saying: " I honey y'all."
This scene said everything... The two lovers were enjoying life at this very moment... Their senses awake and alive, passion burning through their veins, love pounding out such a sweet song in their centre and soul, honey was everything they need! Love is everything humans demand...
38 out of l plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Highly nether-rated by die-hards of the starting time mini-series
I liked information technology. Better and better. At first I found the lady cold and not at all like the Meggie I had grown used to from watching the series over and over, but she was further forth in her story at present - she'd borne Ralph's child and raised him to the age of thirteen. The globe was at war. She was lonely and becoming a pragmatist. She didn't expect to encounter him again. (Nosotros didn't either.) THAT is the gift here - more time with the lovers.
Before commenting on the consistently good performances, which were (for the most part) written and played true to the characters lined in the book and performed in the original mini, I must protestation the unsympathetic, growling characterization of Vittorio, Male parent Ralph's mentor at the Vatican. The writer was dead incorrect in having him threaten Ralph with his love for Meggie. "Get over it!" he says, essentially. "Get on with your life!" Vittorio would never have acted so. Maximillian Schell was serious miscasting, but he didn't write his own lines. The same judgments apply regarding the casting and meddling attitude of Meggie'southward female parent- as well sensational, too fell. And out of character.
The confrontation between Ralph and Vittorio comes and then early on in the story that one is tempted to approximate the entire product by it, just it is important to keep watching. Eventually the characters fit in to the almost sacred memories nosotros have of the earlier version and stand as logical segues to the time-line that they must fit into. The son Dane, by the way, is a real goody-goody. I didn't similar him as an adult and I didn't like him as a kid, but he was true to graphic symbol.
Wait - Richard Chamberlain is the best. The love story stands. It was the main reason nosotros watched the beginning one - that and the wonderful performances by the major stars - Kiley, Stanwyck, Simmons. Those folks aren't in that location; two of them we will never run across again, and we will miss them, but we have Richard Chamberlain hither once more, and he was, later all, the heart of the story.
Expect - try thinking of it as a road company performance with a star turn. It's worth seeing. Have another look and see if you don't agree- information technology's bachelor on tape.
I cried.
35 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Okay and so it's not great, simply i think it is worth watching...
Warning: Spoilers
I pondered for a long fourth dimension almost whether or non I should watch this sequel (or prequel, or any it is). My problem was that I had read the book and loved it, seen the original TV series and liked that, and having read its mixed (generally bad) reviews and a little chip about the story I wondered whether this show would firstly exist whatsoever adept, and secondly alter my perception of the original and the book. In the end I gave in and decided to watch it.
Viewed on its own, this show is okay. Without knowing the dorsum story it may well be difficult to selection up large chunks of the storyline just I suspect with no previous knowledge of the original or book, the story, characters and interim are all reasonable. The production although (with nothing to compare to) is likewise reasonable, with the end result existence a reasonable flashy and slightly over sentimental melodrama that was indicative of American television set in the mid nineties. Indeed the only real drawback to this for a first timer would be the somewhat unsatisfying cease.
Notwithstanding compared to the original and the volume at first glance information technology falls flat on its face. Information technology is a complete fabrication and alteration of the original story. It takes most of the original relationships between the different characters, rips them up and makes completely different ones (in doing and so making many of the characters expect stupid and spineless). The beautifully unproblematic original score has a vulgar nineties up date. And the original sets and location that were so really and simplistic (in the way the barren Drogheda of the novel is meant to be) are replaced by cardboard looking sets and glitzy looking locations that remind me of something out of Dr Quinn Medicine Woman, not the original novel! And to top it off the scene when Dan is surrounded past all the animals and birds at the watering pigsty looks so fake that it could take been taken form a Disney cartoon!
Rather ironically though none of the above really thing, because at the end of the mean solar day the whole affair actually boils downwardly to Richard Chamberlain's part it in all. In a strange fashion he is both the bear witness's saviour and its undoing at the same time. The original Television serial was brought out and then presently later the volume and as a consequence their fates and memories kind of got all mixed together. Unlike other historical novels or classics whose stories and characters where known in their own right before Goggle box and pic producers started to implant visual images of them into the public conscious, with the Thorn Birds the Television show created indelible visual realisations of the story's places and characters in Colleen McCullough's novel. Mr Darcys, Robin Hoods and Sherlock Holmes may come and go, merely to many Ralph De Bricassart is Richard Chamberlain. The fact than that despite all the other mediocre things mentioned above that this show had him resume his role no doubtfulness saved it from utter panning. Yet, having said all of that him being their causes three large issues: Firstly it highlights the absent of pretty much all of the rest of the original cast. Secondly information technology asks viewers to tear up the chemistry that was congenital upward between the two leads over 7 and a bit hours in the original and supercede it with a totally different one. Finally, and for me most importantly, it asks you modify that imagine of Ralph that you have in your head, because although it is still Richard Chamberlain, it is non the same Richard Chamberlain. In truth he was probably not ridiculously far of the age that Ralph was meant to be in 1942/three when they filmed this, but the problem is that he aged naturally totally differently to how he was aged artificially in the original, the end result being in this show a rather older a fuller figured looking Ralph than what the original suggests turns upward on Drogheda a decade later on this bear witness is meant to be set.
So do I regret watching it. No. Because despite all its pitfalls and tackiness (and out and out crimes against the book) this adaption offers (with a little stretch of the imagination and tinkering with the ending) something that neither the novel of original series does. An option of a happy ending. The beautiful novel despite all the environment of Drogheda, the Clearys and the Roman Cosmic Church is essentially nigh a homo'southward struggles against himself and coming to terms with them too late. This adaptation offers a conduit to the reply to that age old question, what if.
vii out of 8 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Disgrace confronting the "real" Thorn Birds
Warning: Spoilers
I think this pic should never have been made. It is wrong in so many ways at one time.
Information technology does non fit in with the story as nosotros know it. In the real Thorn Birds, Begetter Ralph states in plain words that he has not seen Meggie in 20 years. Also, it is obviously (still in the original) the outset time he meets her children. I.due east., he tells Justine that "concluding time I saw you you wet on me". He would not have said that, if he had seen her as a teenager, would he..? Also, the children would accept remembered him when he turned up again when they were 19 and 21 - as he had played such a large function in their life in this "the missing years" interlude...
It was only stupid to shoot it without everyone of the old cast except Richard Chamberlain. EVERYBODY is wrong! The new Million is 1 of the best, strangely plenty - she looks quite similar Rachel Ward, but she lacks her vulnerability and girlish charm. She is too difficult, cold and cynical.
Dane is a disaster - a red-haired, freckled, short-necked, broad-mouthed, and stout kid, could never have been the kid of the immensely beautiful, photogenic and nighttime-haired couple Meg and Ralph. No way!
Cardinal Vittorio is another disaster. This role player lacks all the charm and subtlety of Christopher Plummer. And where did the beard come up from - Vittorio looks more like a Greek-Orthodox priest in this version!!!
1000000'due south mother is also incorrect: she has suddenly grown religious, and she has less depth than the original. She is simply too ordinary.
The new Luke O'Neill is the best - he plays the character in merely the same way every bit Bryan Chocolate-brown, and also he has the aforementioned - Australian - accent. That is very important!
Richard Chamberlain, repeating his role, is what makes it a picayune worth watching... He is equally handsome as always, although older of course, and he really tries his best to go into the grapheme again and proceed the movie together. Only, strangely enough, he is not really the same old Begetter Ralph either... He is besides more "ordinary" in this new flick. Something of the charm and magic is defective. (Of course one could argue, that in the new movie he has lost his faith and therefore the aura of holiness...)
I think this "missing years" movie, was merely a way to try to suck the terminal penny out of the original Thorn Birds' popularity. I must say, that I lost respect for Richard Chamberlain when I watched it. He ought not to have lent himself to something like that! Notwithstanding, that I give the movie three stars instead of merely one, is because I think it was a competent piece of entertainment IN ITSELF. If ane had not known annihilation virtually the original Thorn Birds, this could accept been quite a good movie. I especially liked the custody battle, because so many parents the world over will recognize it (unfortunately)... And, as I said, it is always A LITTLE worthwhile but to watch such a handsome man as Chamberlain! :-)
12 out of 17 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent film showing human being passion
What started my interest in The Thorn Birds WAS "The Missing Years." I read the article on the serial in TV Guide (a '97 Valentine's Day issue) that named Ralph and Meggie as i of the virtually romantic couples on television. I didn't know where to get the serial...and then most a year ago, they showed "The Missing Years." This series introduced me to Ralph and Meggie, and, absolutely, it was hard to follow the storyline. But I liked it. I hateful, and so what if the people aren't the same?
1 solar day I bankrupt downwards and bought the whole series. I sat downwardly with sodas watched information technology from beginning to terminate. Some people say that Missing Years is a bad piece. Well, I disagree. Why should Ralph and Meggie wait xix years? If anything, it brought an interesting reason for Ralph's return: he was ordered. He is shown suffering in "Missing Years." In the original, it seemed like he decided to show up...waiting 19 years to do and then. Their reunion was wonderful...and sweet. The way they saw each other after their 10 years of being apart (by accident) and both were taken abroad. Like in the original, they had fought their passion...so it stood to reason that they tried to tell themselves, once once more, that they were over their passion. Their departing in Missing Years was sugariness and brought tears to my eyes. It was a private moment betwixt them. If his reputation is already on the line (and no doubtfulness, would be severely tarnished if Dane'southward paternity were revealed), how would it look for Archbishop De Bricassart to be hugging and kissing Meggie at the railroad train station?
Dane's character seemed true to how information technology was in the original. If annihilation, it was easier for me to see young Dane first and so developed Dane. In the original, Dane said he'd e'er wanted to be a priest. Well, in the Missing Years, young Dane seems at peace with his decision. We see his placidness and calmness in several instances. Also, in the original, Ralph said he'd always felt closer to Dane. It was skilful that he encounter Dane at a younger historic period and get to know him. Granted, in the original, he just meets Dane as an adult...so there'southward a plot difference at that place, I'll acknowledge. Aye, Dane is a goody goody. But he's supposed to be--he's the more priestly version of his begetter. I liked the young boy that played Dane...I thought he did a corking chore. He seemed, to me, more than real than his zombie-similar adult counterpart. Granted, Philip Anglim had a stiff resemblance to Richard Chamberlain and could hands be seen as an adult version of a Meggie-Ralph combination. It was highly important that there be a immature Dane. Subsequently all, y'all needed to see Meggie'southward partiality to Dane as a child. In the original, it takes awhile before it'due south shown that Dane IS Meggie's favorite. In the original series, young Meggie says "I'll never love whatever of my children different from the others." "Missing Years" shows that she'due south contradicted herself. Meggie DOES dear Dane more than Justine--information technology'south shown in their commencement scene together; in the original, she TOLD Justine she did--the younger Justine picked upward on information technology more than--the sibling rivalry for Justine against Dane was realistic. Ralph and Dane had a stiff connexion even when Dane is a youngster. Plus the fact that Dane, at a young age such every bit x, knows he wants to be a priest is a harsher blow to Meggie... because she has to hear about it everyday and suffer through her deprival that "He'south just a kid--he'll grow out of it." It made sense that she kept saying that.
Fee, in the Missing Years, was a lot worse than the Fee in the original. I hateful, spoiling whatever shot of happiness for Ralph and Meggie? Jeez...that'due south harsh!
I must acknowledge to being naive when I saw the Function Two preview. I actually thought that Ralph would requite up the priesthood...just and then he couldn't, could he? Granted, I didn't know that he'd become Cardinal and dice as thus.
All in all, I liked the movie a lot. I may be alone here, merely I saw a lot of chemistry between Amanda Donohoe and Richard Chamberlain. Sure, it was different than the Ward-Chamberlain chemistry, but still...information technology was stiff. The dear scene was skilful...after all, they'd been in denial about their passion for so long and couldn't fight information technology anymore. Later 10 years of being without the adult female he loved, it stands to reason that Ralph would doubt where he belonged. On one hand, he wants solely to be Meggie's...and Meggie's alone. On the other, the Central'south robe looks awefully promising. I LOVED watching him fight for Dane. I think it'due south realistic that he could've won--after all, it's the lion protecting his cub, albeit subconciously. I loved the line: "The boy is MINE." If Ralph only knew...
I thought there was more focus on Meggie & Ralph in the Missing Years. I was glad for it. They have to run across each other again and think...then they accept to try to tell themselves it'southward over. But it'south NOT over. In the end, as Ralph puts it, their love "is a blessing, non a brunt." Their farewell is peaceful and, for once, leaving no hurt feelings. That makes the side by side nine years they're apart, no uncertainty, easier to deport. THEN they tin can reunite when Dane is older.
The passion between them (in both series) take made Ralph and Meggie one of my all-time favorite couples. I only tin can't hate (for the almost part) "Missing Years" for beingness different--in some places I appreciated the differences.
38 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A genuine Aussie version at last
I liked it. Mainly because this was actually filmed in Australia. I never constitute the original credible. The awful attempt to make Hawaii look similar rural Commonwealth of australia by chucking a few sheep into the background failed dismally and the Drogheeda mansion looked like a poor relation of the house from 'Giant'. As for the weird, definitely non-Aussie out-buildings - what a joke. This time the authentic location made 'The Missing Years' much more believable. Equally for the immature Dane being criticized for having a broad Aussie accent - how dumb tin you be. He is an Australian grapheme existence played by an Australian male child - what would y'all adopt - 1 of those fake cockney Hollywood versions of an Australian accent? The plot was fine, if a flake anticipated, the interim was as good every bit any in the original, if non amend. So information technology was not the original bandage. Then what? Accept it for what it is - amusement - and enjoy it.
30 out of 44 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Did the writers even READ the book?
I could have handled the change in characters - if they showed whatever resemblance in looks or character to the book or miniseries versions.
I could have handled the adaption of script - if they kept to the general plot of the book.
Merely everything was changed. Everything was different! The only thing that was similar apart from Richard Chamberlain was their names!
Why the heck did Luke O'Neill plow upwardly on Drogheda? Why did Justine even similar him? Why the heck was Vittorio fat and unkempt? Why was Dane a red headed chump of a kid? Why was Meggie some cold-hearted cow? What on earth possessed Richard Chamberlain to think it was a proficient idea to reprise his office in a shitty version?
This was bloodcurdling, and totally ruined the integrity of the story. This wasn't based on The Thorn Birds novel at all, this was an entirely fabricated upwardly story that used the aforementioned names and locations!
(If I could credit anything, was at least they cast Australian actors.)
5 out of 6 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a disgrace to the existent "thorn birds",very disappointing
I watched this movie a few weeks ago on Boob tube and i was very,very disappointed.I only watched the commencement but it is a pure fiction compared to the original miniseries.When Ralph tells Justine he saw her when she was a baby,it is true because in Colleen MC cullough'south novel,she writes it,and Ralph came at the Mueller's home when Meggie was on vacation for a residuum on mat lock isle.And jussy peed on him!and he was wet.But it is a detail.In the novel,Ralph sees his son for the outset time,equally a kid,while he must be 10 or 12 and not 19.But i was shocked because Luke never reappeared in Meggie's life and never kidnapped his son.This is utterly invented.And Fee is likewise talkative also in this moving-picture show.She talks all the fourth dimension while in the miniseries and the novel,she is described every bit a silent and biting woman.In fact this movie betrays the original miniseries and the novel of Colleen MC cullough.I wonder why Richard chamberlain needed to accept this following of the miniseries.This is stupid!!
vii out of eleven found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a Wonderful Film very Moving
Richard Chamberlain plays a perfect part it is a very moving Moving picture which impressed me and my wife. the filming must take been very difficult and the atmospheric condition very warm only information technology was very well put together and acted by all.
28 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why did they mess with a good thing?
The original Thorn Birds mini serial was 1 of the most passionate and vibrant works to ever grace the small-scale screen. A sequel is already a chance due to the high expectations involved. The first pace in the incorrect direction was not casting Rachel Ward as Meggie...what were they thinking? Although the new actress can deliver her lines, she'll never match the chemical science that Ward/Chamberlain had in the original. I might have forgiven the absence of Ward if the script remained truthful to the original, but it certainly didn't. Not only did the bulk of the situations completely disregard what was put forth in the novel, only they also turned what was rare and cute into a soap opera fiasco. In brusque, it should not have been attempted in the first place. Read the book or watch the original...avoid watching this one!
13 out of 28 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Comments to AnnieP
But saw your review of the moving-picture show and it made me grin. My son Zach played Dane in the moving picture. The funny part is that Zach is anything Only a goody-goody; how he was able to plow on the charm when the cameras were rolling is beyond me. The character definitely was a fleck too sappy and innocent, but it worked inside the framework of the story. My stance is that Amanda Donohoe was poorly bandage as Meggie, which was the mini-series' downfall. You say that the moving picture is available on video, but I haven't seen it anywhere, nor has Warner Bros. released information technology to video stores. ( I practise, however, have my ain copy of it, sent to me past the studio. )
Shooting the film in Commonwealth of australia was a complete blast -- the best experience nosotros've ever had in this business. Thank you for your comments. It'due south interesting to read reviews about my son's work!
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Touching, Unforgettable
To this day, I still read the volume; information technology'south a book you can't put down and information technology's a story you can't forget. An unattainable love truthful but And then deep and consuming! Richard Chamberlain is a versatile actor and though he was the only member of the original cast present; I was happy the whole time I watched this. Amanda'southward portrayal of Meggie is different from Rachel Ward'south - cynical and harsher- simply she had Meggie's vulnerability as well so I say Ms. Donahue's performance was proficient besides. And I loved the boy who played young Dane; I hope he'due south notwithstanding interim presently- immature Dane was just like developed Dane in the original mini-serial; sensitive, loving and knowing what he wants. What I didn't like about the picture show; the Vittorio was completely different from the Vittorio in the original mini serial. Christopher Plummer was an understanding, shrewd and compassionate man, this one was rather narrow minded and unsympathetic! Didn't he sentinel the original? And where on world was Bob Cleary, Nosotros simply saw Jack! Simply the biggest surprise was Fee- gossipy, talkative Fee! I beloved this film however.
three out of five found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shouldn't have been fabricated
Warning: Spoilers
As some of our reviewers accept already said, this picture should not have been made in the beginning place. Making a sequel, prequel or midquel is always a great challenge, especially when the original movie is as epic as in this instance. Midquels are particularly challenging, because both the start and the end of the story are supposed to exist given. It is not that this particular midquel is bad. Well, it is bad, to be sure. But there is more to it. The movie is simply pointless; it adds pretty much nothing to the original story. Information technology doesn't enrich information technology in any perceivable fashion. Well, perhaps I had been expecting much. But what is the point of making an insertion to the story without saying anything new? OK, so they met each other in the 40s. Then what? Does this add annihilation to the emotional substance of their relationship?
Another trait that hasn't been pointed out in other comments is that the film is likewise americanized: only 1 storyline, extremely straightforward, with quite a predictable "Happy" end. Only perhaps the nearly ridiculous of all scenes was that of the fist-fight, in which a immature Aussie farmer gets bitten past an ageing priest. Come on, guys! This is not even funny.
Diagnosis: don't waste product your fourth dimension.
v out of ten found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Simply awful
I was utterly disappointed by this movie. I accept recently bought both series on DVD every bit I had seen the showtime i in the past and liked it very much. While the first mini-series was fantastic, the second i was just awful. I could merely watch one-half of it because it seemed to have fiddling in mutual with the original "Thorn Birds"; it simply lacks the romance and the characters do not possess the emotional depth of the first series. Fee Cleary, the tough, repose woman we all knew from the start series, couldn't cease talking in this one. Besides, the dialogues are pathetic, it almost seems like a parody of the commencement mini-serial. Absolutely disappointed!
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
IF YOU MUST Meet THIS
This would of been great if this office of the story was in the original just it wasn't! So here it is 13 years afterwards! Only Richard returns! We have a woman bandage as Meggie that looks like she be more at habitation on the Womens P.G.A. Tour! The story here is weak! Information technology is still a niggling kick to meet one-time friends but when your friends accept had face-lifts they don't seem the aforementioned! If this is the simply affair left at the video store one nighttime READ a book in fact read the THORN BIRDS
iv out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Generally Disappointing
I was but ii when the original miniseries came out, but ever since I was in near grade five or vi, and first saw it, I've absolutely loved it and even created a webpage dedicated to The Thorn Birds.
On a down note, I was highly disappointed in The Missing Years. I think they should have just left information technology with just the miniseries. Those who were in it, for the most part did not suit their role. Luckily they were able to get Richard Chamberlain in it. The storyline just didn't exercise anything for the original. There were many things in which you know would never take happened.
Although I did like the office when Ralph fought with Luke. And the ending was sweet. But many parts simply seemed as well far fetched. It was a dainty try to make this, simply they should take just left it. Especially altering the actual characteristics of the original characters such as Fee... And Vittorio.... That'south merely incorrect o_o
Anyway, as I said before, I found it quite disappointing and many other fans seem to concord with me upon information technology. I take watched it and I practice have a copy, mainly considering I already take the miniseries. Just it can sometimes be amusing to scout it only to see how very different it is from the original and to run into the fight scene.. Even if I've merely seen it two to three times since 1996...
Some people like information technology, some don't, but hope the original comes out on DVD.
7 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An insult to The Thorn Birds
This film was really bad. Information technology didn't make whatsoever sense. For instance in the original the outset time Ralph sees Dane is when he is a teenager. The terminal time Ralph and Meggie saw each other before 1954 was Matlock Island in 1935. In the original Ralph tells Meggie its nearly been twenty years since nosotros saw each other. Fee and Vittorio were actually bad in the missing Years. Fee had no personality and Vittorio was really mean. Dane also had a strong Aussie emphasis compared to the original when it was a Usa accent. The merely adept thing about this movie was the score just again not as good every bit the original. They should of left the thorn birds alone. At that place was no point for a sequel to be made in the eye of a story nosotros all know that Ralph dies. They should take made a new movie called the thorn birds: the side by side generations that takes identify afterwards Ralph'southward death.
8 out of 22 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thorn Birds-Missing the Point!
This sequel departs from cannon of the original story and so, one wonders if the creators actually viewed the original mini-serial. Information technology was a shame to run into Colleen McCullough's carefully detailed characters (some of them) aptitude to arrange the plot of this contrived work. Oddly, Feonna Cleary (an a-vowed atheist in the original mini-series) has suddenly found faith and speaks about "God's greatests blessings" a multitude of times through out the flick. To-wit, as well, after years of running Drogheda, she is relagated in this sequel to knitting and a "cheery attitude". Amanda Donahoe does a reasonable job of potraying Megan Cleary-O'Neil. Richard Chamberlain seems to work very hard at keeping the characterization of Fr. (now Arch Bishop) Ralph D'Brickesar authentic. A portion of the original mini-serial is totally ignored in respect to the character of Luke O'Neil (in respect to Meagan'southward ending her relationship with him) And Lastly, this is really the nineties (well at present the millinium) Does anyone actually sigh with relief when Luke O'Neil arrives on the scene because (as "Fee" puts it) "We need a man around the place"? I say rent or own the original and get out the missing years missing in activity!
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a wonderful t.v series
I have seen the moving picture in 2002, to me... It was a beautiful movie, one among the excellent movies that has always been produced. The characters projected their roles naturally,the story and locations that has been called to use for scene are perfect the movie itself was and then unforgettable. It breaks my heart when it came to the office that Dane told her mom that he wanted to enter priesthood and that he volition be away from her, did not realized that he is actually going with his male parent and following his footsteps, also the scene when Megie getting married the aforementioned time that father Ralf took a bow to become a fundamental ( his passion )also to the part when Dane drown and died for saving the 2 ladies from existence drowned , and that he supposed to go home to his mom for Christmas, but what went dwelling was a cold dead torso of megie'southward boy. Some other center breaking role was, Dane died without even knowing that father Ralf was his real father. Such a beautiful story.
3 out of 7 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dreadful
As an Australian I cringe. It was bad enough watching the mini-series where the Australian flavor of the book had been turned into American vanilla - at least the acting was good. But this..... the acting was but awful. The whole affair was dreadful.
4 out of eighteen found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117901/reviews
Post a Comment for "How Old Was Rachel Ward Reviews for Thornbirds"